Are you GUILTY of greenwashing?

Has your organisation done its bit? One of the easiest ways to prove to the world that you care about the environment is to switch to a green electricity tariff.


If you have, well done, pat yourself on the back and make sure it’s put in the annual report for a bit of positive PR. But what are you actually trying to achieve with your electricity supply?


Maybe you work for a large company and it’s simply about compliance, where using renewable energy delivers against some of your obligations. Then frankly, you probably won’t worry too much. You’ll have done all that’s expected of you. But if you really care and you’re trying to make a difference then you need to look deeper.


From where I’m sitting this is where the problems start. When you do an in-depth check there really isn’t a lot in the market that fits the bill.


To make a difference, shouldn’t your tariff be directly tied to renewable energy? Shouldn’t it be directly paying for more renewables to come on stream? As far as I can see, the tariffs just aren’t there. 

100% renewable – really? 

Your tariff might be sold as 100% renewable energy but there’s nothing stopping an energy supplier buying electricity produced from any source on the open market and then perfectly legally also buying Renewable Energy Guarantees Origin (REGO) certificates or Guarantees of Origin (GOO) from the EU to cover the same amount of energy.


A renewable generator is entitled to a REGO or GOO certificate for each megawatt hour of electricity it produces. These can be lawfully brought and sold and cost very little, but make the electricity supplied 100% renewable for reporting purposes.


And that’s my main issue. So much of what I see in the commercial and domestic markets is simply greenwash marketing. Good Energy has regularly complained about this, but even then, there isn’t a 100% guarantee that a tariff is actually making a difference in the way customers may expect.



As a result, aren’t we all guilty of greenwashing? 

Truly renewable

The closest I’ve seen to what I’m talking about is from Ripple Energy, where you join a co-operative and buy a proportion of a wind farm. This is unusual, because most renewables are financed on the back of subsidies that are passed to all customers through their bills, no matter who claims to be supplying the energy. The result is that any company claiming the output misrepresents the reality of how the generation came to exist. In reality, a power purchase agreement (PPA) doesn’t do anything more than a REGO only deal – the off taker is just taking the energy at the market price at the time they transact the PPA (and probably immediately re-hedging it for risk management purposes) rather than actually getting anything new built.


So, if you really want to make a positive difference, you need to find a tariff which is supporting the building of new solar and wind farms. I’m sure they will come but for the moment anything that has been built or is already being developed, is happening (and you’re paying for it) whether you have a green tariff or not.


The energy market is complex and getting more complicated if you want independent help approaching it, feel free to get in touch. Cielo Energy offers an independent advisory and consultancy service on all things energy for companies across the market; built on real world experience.


Stuart Lloyd – Evans

Share this on social media

trader sitting at desk with bank of screens on it
by Stuart Lloyd-Evans 29 October 2024
Trading and Risk management are similar, but different roles. Is it wise to combine them?
laser light shining through cloud of smoke
by Stuart LLoyd-Evans 1 October 2024
Should price signals be ever more complex or simplified? Net zero if changing the electricity market , but the method of price formation remains extremely contentious. There will be winners and losers, so staying on top of the developments is key.
by Stuart Lloyd-Evans 22 August 2024
Increasing Solar electricity generation reduces the relative value of its output at peak times. Long term trends show the impact. PPA buyers, investors and sellers should all be aware of the potential impacts.
by Stuart Lloyd-Evans 2 June 2024
Getting the units wrong can lead to major problems, yet in electricity MW and MWh are somtimes used interchangeably. What's the difference and why does it matter?
by Stuart Lloyd-Evans 23 May 2024
As electricity price shape changes with more renewable generation, different customer groups are treating their exposure very differently. What does it mean for the future?
by Stuart Lloyd-Evans 23 April 2024
Renewable electricity contracts use certificates to prove their credentials. Will increasing the granularity of measurement increase the amount of renewable generation? What are the wider impacts of such a move?
wind turbine with declining price chart
by Stuart Lloyd-Evans 15 April 2024
Electricity prices are increasingly negative on windy days. Whilst this may be sold as good news, the long term consequences of this policy failure are unlikely to be beneficial.
by Stuart Lloyd-Evans 5 February 2024
Managing the cost of balancing the electricity system is expensive, and complex. What is a reasonable level of risk premium for fixing the cost of balancing?
market prices and a cove of an ofgem consultation document
by Stuart Lloyd-Evans 19 January 2024
Electricity Wholesale liquidity is falling in the GB market. Ofgem is concerned that it may not be high enough to give participants what they need. What are the consequences of this and why does it matter?
crystal ball of energy markets
by Stuart Lloyd-Evans 10 January 2024
Long term energy contracts can create large value, or large costs. Creating a contract that works in the long term is complicated, but can ensure security.